From ca90299dd6c892dcec12eb14453939f371f49fe1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Clement <clementchiew95@disroot.org>
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2020 23:53:19 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] New post

---
 blog/content--01 |  1 +
 blog/content-013 | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
 blog/quote-013   |  5 +++++
 3 files changed, 31 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 blog/content-013
 create mode 100644 blog/quote-013

diff --git a/blog/content--01 b/blog/content--01
index 628ccb4..be4ca40 100644
--- a/blog/content--01
+++ b/blog/content--01
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
 </header>
 
 <ul>
+	<li><a href="blog-012">2020-12-09 &nbsp;&nbsp;A Brief Goodbye to CentOS</a></li>
 	<li><a href="blog-012">2020-11-30 &nbsp;&nbsp;Migrating Everything to Proxmox - Part 1</a></li>
 	<li><a href="blog-011">2020-08-20 &nbsp;&nbsp;LXC and Friends</a></li>
 	<li><a href="blog-010">2020-08-13 &nbsp;&nbsp;Programming Anxiety</a></li>
diff --git a/blog/content-013 b/blog/content-013
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..52b5072
--- /dev/null
+++ b/blog/content-013
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+<header>
+		<h1>A Brief Goodbye to CentOS</h1>
+</header>
+
+<p>The traditional CentOS Linux distribution as we know it is dead. Here is another drop in the ocean of opinion pieces that follow the news of its death. After cooling down from the initial rush of blood to my head, here is my take on this event.</p>
+
+<h2>Why Did This Probably Happen</h2>
+<p>With the advent of DevOps and SRE, businesses and startups are moving away from the old-school concept of traditional server clusters to running their applications on disposable containers. The trend is clear and true. Developers are increasingly less reliant on a tried-and-true Linux distribution that lasts for a decade. With containers, developers can develop, test, deploy, and rollback with blazing fast velocity.</h2>
+
+<h2>How It Will Affect All of Us</h2>
+<p>Without a doubt one of the most popular Linux distributions to ever exist, CentOS was prevalent among all kinds of computing systems ranging from simple database servers to billion-dollar computer clusters. There are countless organizations have made the business decision to keep using the traditional model, or organizations that do not require microservices at all. With CentOS drawn from below their feet, a lot of organizations will be forced to migrate to another option, or fork out a pretty penny for RHEL. Besides, on-prem deployment of any container orchestration tool still requires a stable Linux distribution.</p>
+
+<p>The second ripple effect it will have is towards the skilled professionals who have spend decades on CentOS. Not every company is willing to pay up for RHEL or risk using CentOS Stream. For those who migrate to Debian or OpenSUSE, they will have to retrain and adapt with different tools.</p>
+
+<h2>Questioning IBM/Red Hat Decisions</h2>
+<p>The most obvious of them all was, was it necessary for CentOS to die? With CentOS Stream to track ahead of RHEL, it is still possible for CentOS to remain functional and serve its purpose. This is clearly a business decision to increase profits. It used to be that developers wanted to write for RHEL but did not want pay for it; CentOS filled that need. What also happened was that some companies decided that they wanted the free experience all the way. Red Hat now provides free use of the Red Hat Universal Base Image for developers. With this, companies no longer have an excuse.</p>
+
+<p>Secondly, why the PR disaster? In hindsight, there is no way to deliver this news gently to the public. However, I felt that Red Hat gave the bird to the open source community, especially those who contributed to CentOS, by pulling the plug on Centos 8 towards the end of 2021. There wasn't even a courtesy to end it later then CentOS 7's EOL date, June 30th 2024. A raw-dogged "Pay up, now" to everyone. </p>
+
+<p>Last of all, what is the next move from Red Hat/IBM? With CentOS gone, there is a huge vacuum for another to take its place. RHEL sources are still available and can still be repackaged. While Red Hat currently has massive influence over Linux in general, is this a arrogant statement proclaiming "Hey, you can't live without me"? Another ominuous take with conspiratorial undertones would be that Red Hat plans to scrap the eventually FOSS model, but I would have to wear my tin hat for this one.
+
+<h2>So, What Happens Now?</h2>
+<p>Almost immediately after the release, all the attention is now directed to towards filling the space that CentOS will leave behind. Undoubtedly, Ubuntu and SUSE would try to assert their presence with their open source alternatives. Debian, the largest behemoth of them all, hopefully will receive funding and participation like never before. A silver lining of this event would perhaps be the buzzing excitement of what will be and can be. It is time to be excited about Linux again. I, for one, have to begin migrating my CentOS containers and virtual machines to Debian.</p>
+
+<p>CentOS's founder, Gregory Kurtzer, is working with the community to establish Rocky Linux. Join them at https://webchat.freenode.net/#rockylinux .</p>
diff --git a/blog/quote-013 b/blog/quote-013
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..940bc55
--- /dev/null
+++ b/blog/quote-013
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+<blockquote>
+I doubt that the imagination can be suppressed. If you truly eradicated it in a child, he would grow up to be an eggplant.
+<br>
+- Ursula K. Le Guin
+</blockquote>